<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft ads&#8230; someone&#8217;s missing the boat</title> <atom:link href="http://www.davelachapelle.ca/2009/04/17/microsoft-ads-someones-missing-the-boat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.davelachapelle.ca/2009/04/17/microsoft-ads-someones-missing-the-boat/</link> <description>Web Technology Specialist</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 17:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator> <item><title>By: Joey JoeJoe Jr. Shabadoo</title><link>http://www.davelachapelle.ca/2009/04/17/microsoft-ads-someones-missing-the-boat/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link> <dc:creator>Joey JoeJoe Jr. Shabadoo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:37:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.davelachapelle.ca/?p=110#comment-114</guid> <description>Here here Jon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here here Jon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett</title><link>http://www.davelachapelle.ca/2009/04/17/microsoft-ads-someones-missing-the-boat/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link> <dc:creator>Jett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:35:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.davelachapelle.ca/?p=110#comment-113</guid> <description>I don&#039;t disagree that Apple computers generally come in above the &quot;entry level&quot; PC price range, that said, its interesting to note that there are additional costs with a PC that most people don&#039;t consider.  For example, that PC isn&#039;t going to last long on the internet, browsing, sharing photos without anti-virus - now your $429.99 computer just became $500.  Want to add a word-processing (Office for Windows or iWork for Mac), now you&#039;re looking at $700 and $1100.  You&#039;ll note the price difference is shrinking as you add software that you&#039;d normally add.You also have to keep in mind, people who are concious about how long their laptops will last / be supported, should be aware that Apple has a much better track record of supporting hardware for extended periods of time (8 year old computers can run OS X 10.4 with relative ease, I&#039;d like to see the same said of Vista).  So you&#039;re looking at spending an extra $400 for a computer that could potentially last you an extra 3 years, pretty good price if you ask me.Just some food for thought.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree that Apple computers generally come in above the &#8220;entry level&#8221; PC price range, that said, its interesting to note that there are additional costs with a PC that most people don&#8217;t consider.  For example, that PC isn&#8217;t going to last long on the internet, browsing, sharing photos without anti-virus &#8211; now your $429.99 computer just became $500.  Want to add a word-processing (Office for Windows or iWork for Mac), now you&#8217;re looking at $700 and $1100.  You&#8217;ll note the price difference is shrinking as you add software that you&#8217;d normally add.</p><p>You also have to keep in mind, people who are concious about how long their laptops will last / be supported, should be aware that Apple has a much better track record of supporting hardware for extended periods of time (8 year old computers can run OS X 10.4 with relative ease, I&#8217;d like to see the same said of Vista).  So you&#8217;re looking at spending an extra $400 for a computer that could potentially last you an extra 3 years, pretty good price if you ask me.</p><p>Just some food for thought.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Spenceley</title><link>http://www.davelachapelle.ca/2009/04/17/microsoft-ads-someones-missing-the-boat/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link> <dc:creator>Jon Spenceley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:24:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.davelachapelle.ca/?p=110#comment-112</guid> <description>I would argue that  you can do the same thing for the Mac ads...really, pitting a young, &#039;hip&#039; mac against an old, heavy-set PC and mocking Vista is really no different than someone passing up a Mac by sarcastically commenting that they&#039;re not cool enough to use oneIn the commercial, they&#039;re trying to find a cheap laptop, and make no mention of performance or added features. The cheapest Mac I could find on their site started at $999 new, whereas the Future Shop flyer I have in front of me has an HP for 429.99. If you&#039;re a user looking for a laptop to browse the internet, share photos with your family, and generally be &#039;connected&#039; in this global village, the Vista-based PC is going to get you there for $570 cheaper.Windows Fanboy signing off.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that  you can do the same thing for the Mac ads&#8230;really, pitting a young, &#8216;hip&#8217; mac against an old, heavy-set PC and mocking Vista is really no different than someone passing up a Mac by sarcastically commenting that they&#8217;re not cool enough to use one</p><p>In the commercial, they&#8217;re trying to find a cheap laptop, and make no mention of performance or added features. The cheapest Mac I could find on their site started at $999 new, whereas the Future Shop flyer I have in front of me has an HP for 429.99. If you&#8217;re a user looking for a laptop to browse the internet, share photos with your family, and generally be &#8216;connected&#8217; in this global village, the Vista-based PC is going to get you there for $570 cheaper.</p><p>Windows Fanboy signing off.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 6/12 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk
Object Caching 229/232 objects using disk

Served from: www.davelachapelle.ca @ 2012-02-05 14:41:25 -->
